In large companies, the Australia Phone Number List system is made up of multiple applications, each managed by a dedicated team, in agile mode or not. Business processes are rarely carried out within a single application. Much more often, they are transverse and require several of them to be done. Classic case: one team manages a user portal, another manages an application managing certain types of transactions that the user triggers from their portal, another manages the ERP (often in non-agile mode) which provides data and transactions including the portal also needs. If each Product Owner develops his application brick with his own priorities without consultation with his neighbors, there is a great risk of divergence, and therefore of
inconsistency in the process offered to end users at the time of reconciliation. And what result if everyone puts into production at their own pace, without having checked that the prerequisites for other bricks are in production, or that they have not altered a function which was nevertheless essential to others? Or if the interface contracts between each brick have not been clarified and they can suddenly no longer communicate with each other? Good architecture can greatly simplify problems Thanks to the standards of internet architectures, a good part of the problems can be simplified. If modularity was well designed from the start, if the architecture is resource-oriented as for all Internet services, if data services are separated
Why Would There Be A Problem
from transactional services, if they are managed as resources and use APIs REST, each team already regains a great deal of autonomy. But it’s not always the case. And on the other hand, the need for an overall general design which prevents each brick from functionally diverging remains. Coordination of POs and / or “scale” frameworks? In an ideal world, with POs all working for a common goal which is the prosperity of their business, they have a form of coordination that allows them to align with each other and ensure that the bricks do not functionally diverge. , possibly with the help of an enterprise architect.
And the Scrum Masters organize “Scrum of scrum” to deal with the problems of adhesions and coordination. And as in this ideal world the architecture has been well thought out, the problems of interfaces and technical adhesions are also resolved. In real life, POs depend on different Directorates, each have objectives that are not necessarily aligned, and are reluctant to take into account needs related to issues other than their own. And whatever their good will, they also have a fragmented vision of the overall picture, which makes them oblivious to the side effects of their microdecisions. This is why frameworks like SAFE,
Good Architecture Can Greatly Simplify Problems
which is the best known, have appeared. They try to put in an organizational framework to ensure coordination between the teams and guarantee the coherence and integration of the whole. The purpose of this short article is not to detail them here. Agilists say at length of articles that it is no longer agile (loss of autonomy of the PO, many layers between the client and the developer, a system of engagement which strongly limits the adaptability of sprints in sprints, etc…). They’re right. But tending towards this type of operation, probably through opportunistic cherry picking, is nonetheless a compromise deemed necessary by many organizations.to the patient’s needs. The challenge is to have an interaction between the device
and the smartphone to communicate and collect data directly. For example, a hand prosthesis connected with an application could obtain new functionalities in real time. It is also possible to vary the safety of the hand or knee prosthesis depending on the activity performed by the patient. Artificial intelligence for bionic prostheses, ie a self-adjustment of the latter  . This process is still in the research stage but has very conclusive results for optimizing in particular the rehabilitation and the adaptation of the prosthesis to different walking styles. Neuroprostheses resulting from the collaboration between technological and surgical research. Connected directly to the brain, these prostheses will one day be able to rediscover tactile sensations while simplifying the daily lives of patients. The evolution of materials to bring more comfort to