Eliminate as many PDFs as possible and work with simple tables. A PDF is a ‘print format’ and it is not sufficiently digitally accessible. For example, for reading software, deciphering texts and tables in PDFs is quite a task or even impossible. Often creating and distributing PDFs turns out to be a habit, with no apparent reason to use them.

Consider whether information can also be included as ‘regular’ web content, so that everyone can read it directly on the site itself. Tables can be digitally accessible if they are formatted in HTML. It is advisable to keep tables simple and above all clear. Note: if an editor uses a PDF or table, he/she must also create a detailed text.

Phase 4: reading aloud structure of the text

A colleague of the editorial team then reads the message or article. Ideally, this is the director, editor-in-chief or a fellow editor. He/she gives feedback on the structure of the text, content and core message, consistency with other messages on the same theme. He/she also refers to possibly related sources and makes a proposal for a possible publication date.

The feedback relates to the core message, content and VP Audit Email Lists possibly a clear call-to-action (the action perspective). Final editing takes place later in the editing process, that is not up to the director.

VP of Audit Email Lists

The response is added to the working document and in the online work environment. Depending on whether feedback is given, the message goes back to stage 3 or continues to the next stage.

Phase 5: substantive testing (optional)

Substantive counter reading is usually relevant for self-developed, more in-depth, substantive and/or technical messages and articles. In this phase, the editor consults the text with the appropriate expert(s) within the organisation. This expert does not have to be a member of the editorial board itself.

This person is asked to assess the content message for correctness and consistency. At the discretion of the substantive expert, further coordination of the content will take place.

The feedback is added to the working document and preferably placed back in the online work environment. Depending on whether feedback is given, the message goes back to stage 3 or continues to the next stage. The expert may decide to keep the article or to submit it to a second expert.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.