After the machine Canada Phone Number List in the and Taylorism, digital is the 3 rd largest industrial revolution and upsets our deep societal structures. It seems that modern technologies, developed by humans, are taking over, and repackaging it: addiction to screens, reduced attention time, unlearning of spelling with the use of automatic correctors, potential for long unlearning. term of writing with the use of voice assistance. As digital technology has a profound impact on our lifestyles and our cognitive capacities, the world of work is obviously no exception. Behind this impact of digital technology on the world of work lies the notion of the

automation of increasingly sophisticated tasks, made possible by technological progress, in particular Artificial Intelligence (AI). So are machines going to rob us of our jobs? Yes, one can imagine that, because, if the effects are already being felt on certain types of workstations that do not require extensive training, such as for example the gradual replacement of checkout hosts by automatic checkouts; forecasts concerning future changes in the world of work indicate that certain jobs today considered to have “high added value” and accessible only after long higher education, are doomed in the medium term to disappear:

So Are Machines Going To Rob Us Of Our Jobs

for example, lawyers will be replaced by algorithms, able in seconds to compare and mechanically analyze thousands of cases, which would be impossible for an individual, however educated and talented. The beginnings of these effects of automation are already being felt: surgeons have been assisted for several years by robots in the operating room and certain types of operations (such as that for pancreatic cancer ) are already being carried out by surgeons. Hyper sophisticated robots, considered to be able to perform more precise, more meticulous and therefore safer gestures than the surgeons themselves. To have a more


precise idea of ​​the impact of automation and to quantify it, it is today announced that 3 million jobs would be threatened in France by 2025 years and that 42% of jobs would be automatable, d ‘after a study by Roland Berger. This relatively alarmist vision is supported by the philosopher Bernard Stiegler in ” The automatic society, the future of work , Tome 1″ To get around the potentially dramatic effects produced by increasing automation, he suggests that the resulting productivity gain be redistributed to workers … It is also work that Bernard Stiegler wants to talk about, in opposition to the notion of employment, which according to him is

So Is Work Doomed To Disappear

indeed doomed to disappear due to the automation of tasks and the alienation of individuals to the machine . So is work doomed to disappear? No, not necessarily … Moreover, the idea behind this distinction made between work and employment makes it possible to imagine a world where humans still have a role to play and tasks which would be completely devolved to them because they cannot be replaced by a machine. or an algorithm, however powerful they may be. Stiegler thus speaks of negentropy , insisting on the need for man to restore a form of disorder and disautomatize the routine, a way to regain control. In addition, Stiegler

qualifies the most alarmist scenario by recalling that our capitalist societal organizational mode could not support the destruction of half of the current positions, to maintain our system we need a minimum purchasing power for a majority of individuals. So automation, can it be good? At this stage, it is interesting to consider the thesis of Jean-Noël Chaintreuil , who sees this revolution in the world of work linked to the advent of digital technology, in a very positive light: He considers digital technology and the automation of certain tasks as solutions allowing people to be reinjected into our world of work. To summarize in a

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.